Let's get one thing straight from the start, Taxi Leaks is an impartial Taxi news website. We carry no paid adverts and do not carry advertorials for any Org, Union or company for monetary gain. The links we do have are there strictly through merit.
Most of all, we are not an org, we do not represent the trade....all we do, is inform the trade.
Having said that, we have found ourselves having to ask TFL's commissioner and directors questions because will feel these important questions are not being asked by our trade representative bodies.
So today, we put these questions to TfLTPH:
1. After last weeks case, can London's Taxi drivers have an apology from TfL who’s COs we’re removing copies of Taxi paper from Taxis, saying the “headline was wrong”? We have video of drivers being harassed.
TfL COs Protecting Uber From Rape Headlines In The Press!
Will TfL now issue an apology to Taxi drivers who were harassed by COs?
2. Could you please tell my under what circumstances, Grayhound Cars have been given an exemption to allow them to display their name on liveried front doors ? Also, I'm told Otto cars is being allowed to advertise on its cars rear body work. Please explain why?
3. In the Reading verdict yesterday judge Emma Arbuthnot on Page 4, section 14 (how the app works)...said it was the driver who accepts the job and only then Uber makes the booking. This is illegal under current legislation laid down by Parliament....Will you therefore revoke Uber’s licence ASAP ???
Judge Emma Arbuthnot, in summing up :
IF THE DRIVER ACCEPTS...THEN UBER COMFIRMS THE BOOKING!!!
We also asked the LTDA the third question adding the caveat 'will you be at Palestra today demanding Uber's immediate revocation?'
As of yet, we've received no answer from any one!
from Taxi Leaks https://ift.tt/2Jg5WzJ
via IFTTT https://ift.tt/2mbpMmz https://ift.tt/12cqxIH
No comments:
Post a Comment